Quote:
Originally Posted by agesilaus
We have a F150 5.4L (8400# tow capacity) and adding a WDH made a very noticeable difference in the handling. Without it every time we hit a bump in the road the trailer would lurch and the TV would feel unstable. With the WDH the combination is rock solid. We could have probably got by without the hitch but it makes driving less stressful especially for the wife.
|
Anything that makes a noticeable improvement in handling while towing is a good thing, IMO. All of our steering and 60% of our braking is with the front wheels, and a properly adjusted WDH keeps the trailer tongue weight from unloading them.
The following excellent post by mtnguy indicates a 480 pount tongue being able to add an impressive 700 pounds to the rear axle without a WDH:
"mtnguy
Site Sponsor Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ruckersville, VA.
Posts: 523
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wayne and I tend to both respond to theses WDH posts on the opposite end of the spectrum……which is a good thing, so that people can see different ideas on this and form their own opinion with their situation.
Since the new Titans and Tundras are now just as big as the big 3, ½ ton pickups and SUVs, I am going to give some stats on my F150 (all weights in pounds):
The Gross Axle Weight Ratings (listed on the driver’s door) is 3850 (rear) & 3750 (front).
Empty axle weights are 2560 (rear) & 3320 (front).
The truck axles go to 3260 (rear) & 3100 (front) when I add 480 to the hitch (425 TM tongue + 55 WDH equipment).
So the rear truck axle goes up by 700 by just adding 480 to the hitch.
So, I still have close to 600 to go before I reach my GAWR. But when I load up scuba gear and tanks, firewood, toolboxes, extra water, etc., a canoe and bikes on the trac racks, plus the extra battery that I added to the tongue (after I did the weight-ins), plus water in the TM, I betcha I am real close to that GAWR.
There are several other variables with this. The front wheels take some of the load that is in the back of the truck, and the TM axle takes some of the load of the extra battery and water tank, so all (but probably most) of those loads is not on the rear axle. Also, if I didn’t have that extra 65 lbs. of WDH sticking farther out than a standard hitch, then that would also reduce the rear axle load.
2 other thing to consider: From what I have seen on shortbed trucks, the rear wheels sit about center of the bed on quad cab models, and sits forward of center of the bed in crew cab models. So if you have a crew cab style, if you load the bed up evenly throughout, you are putting even more weight on the back axle and taking it off the front. And with the heavier weight on the back axle without the WDH, I would think the chances of the "tail wagging the dog" would be less, since you now have more traction there....did that make sense??
If the WDH didn’t come with my TM, I might have never gone out and bought a setup. But now that I see the difference in weights, and handling, I go to the trouble of using it all of the time. I set the WDH up so that most of the weight is still on my rear axle, but I put a lot of that hitch weight back on the front and TM axle. And yes, I also did a bunch of weigh-ins with different setups.
The ½ ton pickup and SUVs are probably all capable of handling the TM without a WDH, as long as you don’t exceed the hitch, tire, and axle weight ratings. But everyone needs to do the math on their own vehicle, and decide what is best for their situation.
Chap
__________________
2003 2720
2006 Ford F150 4x4 Super Cab"